EIN advises its network of state-level groups to conduct voter list challenges using EagleAI, a tool designed to automatically create lists of ineligible voters. Workers in EIN’s network across the country take these lists and review them manually, and sometimes canvass door-to-door to support their challenges — a practice that is already in place Voter intimidation condemned. expert have already pointed out before Flaws in EagleAI’s system: Small mistakes in spelling a name, such as missing a comma, can lead to a name being wrongly deleted from the voter list. The software is also reportedly facing challenges Numerous technical issuesDespite this, one county in Georgia has already signed a contract with the company to use the tool as part of voter roll maintenance.
Leaked documents Documented this month and published by ProPublica show that one of EagleAI’s funders is Ziklag, a top-secret group of wealthy individuals openly dedicated to advancing a Christian nationalist agenda. According to an internal video obtained by ProPublica, Ziklag plans to invest $800,000 in “EagleAI’s Clean the Rolls Project,” and one of the group’s goals is to “remove one million ineligible registrations and approximately 280,000 ineligible voters” in Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, and Wisconsin.
Mitchell and EIN are also working with several other groups that are supporting large-scale voter roll challenges. One of them is VoterRef, which has obtained and published voter rolls of more than 161 million voters in 31 states. The group is run by Gina Svoboda, a former Trump campaign official and the current chair of the Republican Party in Arizona. State election officials have said that VoterRef’s claims of discrepancies in the voter rolls are “fundamentally false,” and Important privacy concerns highlighted About the data being made publicly available by Voterref.
EIN is also working with a website called Check My Vote, which hosts publicly available voter lists and highlights what it says are irregularities, and is urging those who use the system to create walk lists that activists can use to canvass door-to-door before filing voter challenges, with a template available to download from the site.
Mitchell and EIN did not respond to requests for comment.
“These groups and the broader election denial movement have been building these structures, building these projects, for many months and years in preparation for this moment,” says Brendan Fischer, Documented’s deputy executive director. “And everything is finally falling into place where they can start filing these mass challenges to voter eligibility.”
Voter lists are notoriously difficult to maintain, as federal laws prevent citizens from being removed even several years after they leave the jurisdiction. But there is no evidence that this issue causes voter fraud. And election administrators tell WIRED that the processes in place to make sure voter lists are as accurate as possible are already working.
,[We are] “Over the past year we have seen an increase in voter registration challenges, often submitted by the same individual or entity, on the basis that the voter is no longer residing at the registration address,” says Matt Heckel, press secretary for the Pennsylvania Department of State. “These challenges are an attempt to circumvent the list maintenance procedures that are carefully prescribed by state and federal law.”
