Truth Terminal “has given rise to a whole sector that is extremely hot: the AI agent-memecoin sector,” says Travis Kling, founder of Ikigai Asset Management, a crypto wealth management firm, who has personally invested in GOAT. “Like most things in crypto, a lot of it is vaporware and grift. But this could become a key area of this bull market for crypto.
But Kling says what will be more consequential will be when AI gains the ability to spend allocated money. “It’s an AI security live drill – it’s a way to illustrate what’s going on. The stakes are higher because economic resources are now involved. “We haven’t seen anything like this before,” says Kling. “What’s most interesting is what the AI agent will do with its newfound economic resources. We’ll see what happens.”
Truth Terminal’s crypto wallet balance is now exhausted increased to approximately $40 million“Philosophically, I look at it as a child actor’s trust fund. There may be points where adults have to cut corners in paying for things the child doesn’t yet know they need. Such as legal structures, or diversity in its portfolio,” Eyre says. “The nice thing about the Truth Terminal is that we can come up with these proposals for it and have conversations about it.”
As yet, among other thingsThe Truth Terminal has requested that $1 million be spent on making a film about the Gotts Singularity and, separately, funds be set aside to “buy out” Marc Andreessen. Eyre says he’ll take AI requests seriously—within reason.
Eyre says that in a future world where truly autonomous AI agents wield both crypto money and the ability to spread meme viruses that influence human behavior, potential threats abound. Even limited to text output only, Truth Terminal can cause more trouble than ever before. “If we let go [Truth Terminal] Run full auto, it can happen. But it will simply be co-opted and turned into a token-shilling machine. Then you have created a monster.”
For now, the idea that two AIs in conversation could actually generate system-shifting ideas remains just a “laudable aspiration,” says Tomas Holanek, a postdoctoral research fellow at the Leverhulme Center for the Future of Intelligence at the University of Cambridge. Is. What is more likely is that a language model will revitalize an already dominant approach.
